Abortion

I think we have lost the language battle if we allow the MURDER of children to be defined as “abortion.”

No matter how segments of society decide to term it, these are children — human beings with the same rights as any other human being, and therefore abortion can only be defined as murder.

Murder is defined as one human being knowingly killing another human. Those who condone, support and champion the murder of the unborn believe that these children aren’t human. That begs the question of what other species do they believe they are? The shear ridiculousness of the question shows the total lack of any foundation in this argument. Partial birth (murder) abortion, and the murdering of those born after botched procedures resulted in a live birth, are two more examples of the outrageous treatment of our unborn children.

The only logical conclusion is that those who society wrongly defines as being “pro choice” have also succeeded in wrongfully defining human life as starting only when the decision against the murder has occurred. This backward logic is evident when considering the ever deteriorating standard of when life begins.

These same people once argued that life began at birth, next it was only once totally birthed, then only after birthed if their was no intention to murder the child before birth. Now in the current administration we have those arguing, and who have argued for some time, that a human isn’t a human until long after birth and an identity and personality is developed.

These people and their faith is based in modern Materialism which defines man as only cells and no different than any other conglomerate of cells. I am inviting you to read this Article that explains the modern belief of Materialism and where it always leads.

It is my position that a human being is a human being from the time of conception. One human killing another human being is murder. The federal government has no authority to condone murder based on some created right to privacy that supersedes the unborn human’s right. Therefore I believe that Roe vs. Wade should be overturned.

Our nation was founded on the principles stated in our Declaration of Independence. ” We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men.”

The Preamble to the Constitution says that the “Government” that we instituted to Guarantee these rights, including the right to life, were to “secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity.”

Posterity meaning those yet to be born or even yet conceived.

My position in brief is that we have ignored and perverted the meaning of our Constitution to create rights that don’t exist and deny rights that are plainly stated. Roe vs. Wade should be overturned.

Our rights and life come from God and therefore man has no right to define it. Human life starts when it starts, conception. It is a very simple determination, unless we go against our founding documents and the stated truth that the “Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them” and us to these rights.